• Home
  • Our Services
    • Tax Planning & Tax Prep
    • Accounting & Bookkeeping
    • Payroll Services
    • Small Business Seminars
    • Management Consulting
    • Business Development
  • Quickbooks Services
  • About
    • About Us
    • Our Founder
    • Our Owner
    • Our Team
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Use
    • Ethics Statement
  • Contact
  • Blog
Pathways Consulting
  • Home
  • Our Services
    • Tax Planning & Tax Prep
    • Accounting & Bookkeeping
    • Payroll Services
    • Small Business Seminars
    • Management Consulting
    • Business Development
  • Quickbooks Services
  • About
    • About Us
    • Our Founder
    • Our Owner
    • Our Team
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Use
    • Ethics Statement
  • Contact
  • Blog

Our News and Events

Legal Authority - Get it in Writing

1/5/2015

0 Comments

 
Published November 8, 2014, by Tom Petruska
​
There is a well-established rule in government procurement law that the only person who can bind and commit the government is the warranted Contracting Officer (“CO”) acting within the limits of their authority. Only the Contracting Officer can modify the terms of the contract. And the modifications must be in writing. Regardless of how long this firm rule has been in existence – and firmly and rigidly enforced by the courts – contractors continue to perform work based on verbal “changes” to the terms of their prime contract “authorized” by the Contracting Officer’s Representative (“COR”) or another official.


The failure of a contractor to recognize this principle was discussed by the Armed Service Board of Contract Appeals (the “ASBCA” or the “Board”) in the Appeal of Creek Services, LLC, (“Creek”) ASBCA No. 59127, dated 1 July 2014.

On 14 May 2009, Creek was awarded a Multiple Award Task Order Contract (“MATOC”) by the Army Corp of Engineers for “Greater New Orleans Hurricane and Storm Damage Risk Reduction System.” Task Order 0003 was awarded to Creek on 25 September 2009 for flood protection. On 3 January 2012 Creek submitted a Request for Equitable Adjustment (“REA”) for reseeding due to unusually severe weather. On 28 June 2013, Creek requested a final decision from the Contracting Officer.

On 18 July and on 15 August 2013 Creek requested a meeting with the CO and informed the CO that they were preparing several additional claims but were willing to reach a global solution with the CO in an amount of $725,000. On 27 August 2013 the CO issued a final decision regarding the reseeding claim. On 5 September 2013 Creek asked the CO if she had reviewed its global offer and requested an answer.

On 2 October 2013, Creek met with the CO but no decisions were made and on 11 December 2013 the CO issued a final decision rejecting the claim. Creek filed an appeal on 10 January 2014.

The ASBCA dismissed the appeal as it was filed 135 days after the CO issued the final decision on the reseeding claim which was received by Creek on 28 August 2013 – 45 days after the law required a Notice of Appeal to be filed. Creek argued it was part of a global settlement that was submitted on 15 August 2013 and rejected on 11 December 2013. Creek could not show any evidence of discussions or “reconsideration” of its earlier final decision.

The appellant seemed to believe that exchanges of communications constituted a change to the law or the regulation. But only the CO can issue or reconsider a final decision. No verbal exchanges can change or be a substitute for the written order. So it is critical that a contractor must get a final decision from the CO in writing. Under the CDA, the CO is required to issue a decision in 60 days. An appeal must be filed within 90 days of a denial, or deemed denial, of a claim. This means that each claim included in a CO’s final decision must be appealed to a Board of Contract Appeals within 90 calendar days. This 90 day period may not be waived unless the CO “reconsiders” the final decision – in writing. Meetings, conference calls, and other verbal exchanges do not change a decision or the time to file an appeal. Do not be misled by any conversation with the CO. The CDA time limits cannot be changed, and only the CO can issue written final decisions or reconsideration. Track the time carefully and file appeals timely.

[1] FAR 1.602-1
[2] CDA 41 USC 7104(a)
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    The Pathways Team

    Archives

    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    January 2015
    August 2014

    Categories

    All
    2019 Taxes
    2020
    2020 Taxes
    401(k)
    Accountant
    Accounting
    Artificial Intelligence
    Black Friday
    Blog
    Blogging
    Bookkeeping
    Budget
    Business Blog
    Business Consultant In Charleston
    Business Consulting Summerville Sc
    Business Management Consulting Summerville Sc
    Business Management Summerville Sc
    Business Services And Management Consulting
    Business Services Summerville Sc
    CARES Act
    CDC
    Coronavirus
    COVID 19
    COVID-19
    Cyber Monday
    Dave Ramsey
    Emergency Fund
    Employee Retention Credit
    Estimated Quarterly Taxes
    FAQs
    File Your Taxes
    Filing Taxes In Summerville
    Fishbowl Inventory
    Growth Of Quickbooks
    IRA
    It Consultant Charleston Sc
    It Consulting Charleston Sc
    Management Services Summerville Sc
    Online Jobs
    Online Safety
    Online Sales Tax
    Online Shopping
    Pandemic
    Pathways Consulting
    Payroll Accountants Charleston Sc
    Payroll Accountants Summerville Sc
    Pay Taxes
    Pos Quickbooks Integration Charleston Sc
    Pros And Cons
    Quarterly Taxes
    Quickbooks
    Quickbooks Basics And Beyond
    Remote Work
    Retirement
    Retirement Plan
    Safe Spending
    Sales Tax
    Saving Money
    Selling Online
    Significacnt Other
    Small Business Accounting Service Charleston
    Small Business Bookkeeping Service Charleston
    Small Business Bookkeeping Services Charleston
    Small Business Info
    Small Business Payroll
    Small Business Seminars Summerville Sc
    Smart Spending
    Starting A Business
    Stimulus Check
    Stimulus Check Fraud
    Stimulus Check Scam
    Summerville Sc Tax Services
    Tax Accountant Summerville Sc
    Tax Documents
    Taxes
    Taxes And Accounting In Summerville Sc
    Taxes And Accounting Summerville Sc
    Tax Extension
    Tax Extension 2019
    Tax Planning
    Tax Prepares
    Tax Prep Summerville Sc
    Tax Season
    Tax Services Summerville Sc
    Tax Wrtie-Offs
    WHO
    Work From Home Tax Write-off
    Working From Home
    Work Online

    RSS Feed

Picture
(843) 261-9293
105 South Cedar St. Suite E
Summerville, SC 29483
9:00am- 5:00pm, Monday- Friday​
Site designed by Creative Consulting
Site powered by MadeSimply
  • Home
  • Our Services
    • Tax Planning & Tax Prep
    • Accounting & Bookkeeping
    • Payroll Services
    • Small Business Seminars
    • Management Consulting
    • Business Development
  • Quickbooks Services
  • About
    • About Us
    • Our Founder
    • Our Owner
    • Our Team
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Use
    • Ethics Statement
  • Contact
  • Blog